Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: linear loading

To: <corneliuspaul@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: linear loading
From: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Reply-to: richard@karlquist.com
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:28:24 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> But ON4UN also recommends linear loading AT THE BASE of a vertical to be
> BETTER (less ohmic loss) than a loading coil at the base...?
>
> Isnt that to the contrary of what you 2 wrote?
>
>
> 73 Con DF4SA

That is a false comparison.  The linear loading
is effectively center loading, which has an
advantage over bottom loading.  What I referred
to was center loading with a coil vs center loading
with linear loading.  Linear loading wires are
simply low-Q inductors.

Rick N6RK



_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>