Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] plumb vs. level

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] plumb vs. level
From: "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 03:03:59 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You want your tower straight and plumb.  Small amounts 
of "off-level" in a given section are not important.  

See the tower guide I referenced earlier 

http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/USCG/010480.pdf

Nowhere do they use the word "level" to describe the 
tower or its components - but they use "plumb" in 
several spots.

73 Mike N2MG


> So if plumb AND level can not be obtained, which 
> would be the preferred solution???

> In the case under discussion, the base sounds like 
> it's tapered.

> I'm assuming that the section that goes on top of 
> this base slides over tube tops.

> So my question is: Which is more important, plumb or 
> level?
> 
> Any tower section used as a base and installed in 
> concrete could be slightly imperfect.
> This is, while it could be perfectly plumb, the tops 
> could be slightly out of level.

> In construction, we would call this 'racked'.

> If the tops are out of level, subsequent sections 
> will exhibit a lean wouldn't they?

> So if plumb AND level can not be obtained, which 
> would be the preferred solution???

________________________________________________
PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>