http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2196A1.pdf
Substitute .txt or .doc if you would rather have it in ASCII (.txt) or as a
Microsquish Word document (.doc)
At 21:09 2003-07-07, Chuck O'Neal wrote:
>Very interesting, and thank you! How can we get a copy of this?
>Can you provide a link or directions how to access this?
>73,
>Chuck..K1KW
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Scott Townley" <nx7u@cox.net>
>To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 5:19 PM
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Potentially interesting FCC ruling today
>
>
> > DA 03-2196
> > WT- Docket No. 02-100
> > Adopted July 3, 2003 and released July 7, 2003
> > MO&O stating essentially that municipal ordinances which directly
> regulate RFI are
>invalid, as the FCC is the sole jurisdiction regarding RFI.
> > Case was a cellular carrier vs. a county in MD. County ordinance was
> directed at
>commercial carriers, but precedent is important!
> >
> >
> > Scott Townley NX7U
> > Gilbert, AZ DM43di
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> Weather
>Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
>questions and ask for
>Sherman, W2FLA.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
Scott Townley NX7U
Gilbert, AZ DM43di
http://members.cox.net/nx7u
|