And the European " BON SENS"
Never play with a gun if you dont know from what hole the bullet is coming
out.
Hi Hi.
Jos on4kj
--- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
To: "Martin Ewing" <aa6e@arrl.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Cc: "Chuck Counselman" <ccc@space.mit.edu>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ferrites & fires
>
> > -Unless you have high confidence in the product you are buying _and_ you
> > understand the your operating conditions, you need to over-rate your
> components.
> > That means that a $30-40 PVC thingy might not be a good idea for your
> multi-KW
> > transmmission line. [In a conservative system design, you might require
> that
> > components should survive a serious fault, like an open or shorted
antenna
> > connection - or at least fail safely.]
>
> It's way extreme beyond what's needed for ham gear, but, in the spacecraft
> business, the usual requirement is demonstrated capability with 4x rated
> power (actually twice voltage and twice current, so you could get it with
a
> open/short/transmissionline at rated power). Analysis might work if
testing
> isn't feasible, but your analysis would need to be fairly rigorous.
>
> >
> > -Everybody uses PVC, but PVC is not known for its ability to dissipate
> heat, and
> > it makes pretty nasty smoke. Is there a better design? Open air? Water
> cooled? :-)
>
> PVC should work just fine, if designed appropriately.. (the IF is the
> important word)
>
> >
> > -Some 3rd party should be doing destructive testing on QRO items. This
> could be
> > fun for the right person! Burning attic anecdotes are nice, but it's an
> > inefficient way to learn about products.
>
> Perhaps manufacturers should publish their design analysis that backs up
> their rating claims? The initial thought is that you're going to be
> revealing trade secrets, but, I think that none of these products have any
> special magic in their design. What you're really paying for is that
> someone else is scrounging up the parts, assembling it, keeping them in
> stock, shipping it to you (or to HRO,AES,etc) in a nice box. This is
> definitely worth something (nobody's time is really free, if nothing
else.).
> If someone really does have a magic design, then (theoretically) they can
> patent it, and keep others from manufacturing it for 17 years (I say this
> somewhat cynically... having been involved in some patent infringement
> lawsuits over the years).
>
> >
> > -The line isolator product is available from at least 3 vendors at about
> the
> > same price. MFJ's product info says _nothing_ about power handling
> ability.
> > The W2DU unit (radio-ware.com) claims 10 KW PEP at 10 MHz and 2:1 VSWR.
> What's a
> > fella to do?
>
> Oh yeah, theoretically, that retail price also covers some liability
> insurance to cover the mfr of the device when it doesn't perform to spec,
> burns down a house, and it's traced back to the device. I am fairly sure
> that Chuck's insurance company would do the forensics, find that the fire
> originated where that isolator was, and attempt to recover some of their
> loss from the manufacturer. The net result would be unhappiness all
around
> (Chuck would never get the full value back, the mfr probably would have
> insufficient resources anyway, and lots of people would spend lots of time
> responding to paperwork of one sort or another), but, at least the mfr
would
> theoretically learn to be a bit more forthcoming and responsible.
>
>
> But, to answer Martin's last question: What's a fella to do? A fella is
to
> challenge the mfrs on their specs. A lot of mfrs catering to the amateur
> market seem to play a bit fast and loose with the specs , particularly
when
> it comes to max power ratings and antenna gains. If they can't
substantiate
> it, get larger organizations to stop them from advertising (i.e. do they
> advertise in QST? what about the FTC?). Don't be complacent, don't assume
> someone else is going to take care of it. In my mind, what separates a
> real business from someone making stuff for their friends and
acquaintances
> is the acceptance of the responsibility that comes with selling a product
to
> the general public. That responsibility implies real analysis, real
> testing, real disclosure, etc., and, it doesn't come cheap.
>
>
> Jim, W6RMK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
|