To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] Double posts... |
From: | w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths) |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:47:51 -0800 |
I like it the way it is. I have been on another list that was the way you are suggesting and the result was tons of "junk" responses to the entire list that should only have gone to the sender. I don't want 'em. Stan w7ni@easystreet.com > If you do need to reply to the sender, THEN you can manually reply to > them...not manually every time as you do now. > > What do YOU think? > Dino...k6rix@arrl.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Re: Towertalk digest, Vol 1 #699 - 14 msgs, Rudy Marcelletti, K8SWD |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] General Questions about tower strength, ROBKEL@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] Double posts..., Chuck Counselman |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Double posts..., Larry L Lindblom |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |