I once had a pair of inverted L's for 80 and 160 supported
at 50 ft by a rope between two trees with the tails going
in opposite directions. They were spaced several feet (5?)
at the top and connected at the feedpoint. It presented
a good match on ALL bands and worked quite well. I
remember one time on 20M when I was working all over
the world in a contest and wondered why the signals
did not change as I rotated my 3L20. I finally realized
I was on the 160 / 80 inverted L :-) !
Your idea should also work. You may have to go
back and forth trimming each wire due to interactions.
Tom N4KG
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 (PDT) Jim Apple <wb1dog@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> I've been considering building a BC Trapper (the
> wire version of the Battle Creek Special) But I got
> to wondering if I could skip the traps and run three
> wires in parallel with a single feed instead ... The
> 40m element would be completely vertical the 80 and
> 160 elements would end up as inverted L's.
>
> Any thoughts ? what kind of spacing would be best
> ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> - Jim
>
>
> =====
> - Jim Apple (WB1DOG)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers at discounted prices,
> See http://www.mscomputer.com
>
> Wireless Weather Stations now $349.95. Call Toll Free,
> 888-333-9041 for additional information.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
|