Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] lmr 400 question

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] lmr 400 question
From: n1nk@cox.net (Jim Spears)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:54:05 -0400
I have noticed the same thing.  Their antennas are obviously set for some
real high frequency and the coax is then most likely something less flexible
than RG213.

Jim
N1NK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <n4kg@juno.com>; <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] lmr 400 question


> At 10:26 AM 10/20/02 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
> > >    I would mount the end connector, a female if possible, binding
> > > it to a tower leg with a SS hose band and I would use cheap RG-8/U
> > > as the `whip cable' 4-6 feet is frequently used.  (NOT foam)
> >
> >         Sounds like a good idea to me.   N4KG
>
> I've noticed that the portable news-gathering vans seem to use an
> alternative sort of rotation loop for their antenna masts.  It looks like
> they wrap 6-7 turns of coax around the mast, with the top fixed at the
> antenna and bottom end fixed to the truck body, such that when they rotate
> 360 degrees the coil just loosens or tightens a relatively small
> amount.  That seems like a mechanically superior approach.  Anyone tried
it
> in ham installations?  Would it work better with the stiffer cables?
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Sometimes a tower is just a tower
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers at discounted prices,
> See http://www.mscomputer.com
>
> Wireless Weather Stations now $349.95. Call Toll Free,
> 888-333-9041 for additional information.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>