| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Towertalk] GAO Challenger DX | 
| From: | ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman) | 
| Date: | Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:03:47 -0400 | 
| At 9:12 PM -0700 10/6/02, Mike Lazaroff K3AIR wrote: >...if you want to consistently be #1 in the pileups or turn-in big >contest scores you likely won't be happy with that antenna (or most >other verticals). Agreed. As you can read in U S Army Signal Corp manuals, calculate by means of NEC-4, and/or prove for yourself by experiment, for DX (as opposed to short-range ground-wave work) a horizontal dipole beats a vertical antenna of the same height. -Chuck, W1HIS | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Rohn 45 JBKs, Mike Gilmer, N2MG | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Towertalk] GAO Challenger DX, Jim Shaw | 
| Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] GAO Challenger DX, Mike Lazaroff K3AIR | 
| Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] GAO Challenger DX, Jim Shaw | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |