I agree,
95 feet on the east coast (NY) would be a great height.
We do very well in DX contests with a 2 element 40 at 70 feet.
95 would be even better!!
73, Ted K2QMF
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:55:20 EDT SavageBR@aol.com writes:
> In a message dated 6/30/2002 1:49:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jljarvis@adelphia.net writes:
>
>
> > It would be inappropriate--and probably negative in impact,
> > for out of state hams to comment on a NY legislative matter.
> >
> > However, if this law does, indeed, specify a 95 foot limit, it's a
>
> > gross mistake. Right now, PRB-1 allows an application for "the
> > intended purpose." 95 feet is barely adequate for stacked
> antennas
> > on 10 and 15. It is sub-optimal on 20. It is inadequate for a 40m
> yagi
> > unless your intended purpose is domestic communications. It is
> inadequate
> > for an 80 meter dipole, for international work, and it is
> inadequate for a
> > 160 meter vertical, for pete's sake.
> >
> You must live in a different world. Most of the Ham community would
> be quite
> pleased with HF antennas allowed up to 95 ft.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
|