| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Towertalk] Is Antennex worthwhile? |
| From: | k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins) |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:44:59 -0000 |
> Or maybe you just apply the TANSTAAFL* test? > > 73, Pete N4ZR > > * "TANSTAAFL - There ain't no such thing as a free lunch", thanks Robert > A. > Heinlein for the acronym I kind of like these articles when confronted with claims like have been made on some antennas: http://130.94.24.217/2001/1101issue/1101skeptic.html http://130.94.24.217/2001/1201issue/1201skeptic.html David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Vertical insulated support, <gjerning@flash.net (Arne Gjerning) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Towertalk] head gear, James H. Fitzpatrick |
| Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] Is Antennex worthwhile?, Pete Smith |
| Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Vertical insulated support, ARNE GJERNING |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |