On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 "Mike" <W4EF@dellroy.com> writes:
>
SNIP
>
> As far as the reference to the non-linear ionosphere, I couldn't
> find any. One could infer that this is weakly implied in Tom (N6BT's)
> musings about the seemingly inexplicable huge differences between
> the curtain array and the tribanders on Saipan, but in my opinion that
> would really be a serious stretch. BTW, I suspect the huge differences
> between the two antennas are a combination of poor S-meter calibration
(very
> common) and very a big gain advantage at very low takeoff angles for
> the curtain array (it was, after all, very late in the evening on 15
> meters when you would expect takeoff angles to be very low). Perhaps
> someone should model this?
>
> 73 de Mike,
> W4EF.............................................................
>
I always wondered how far back from the cliff overlooking the Pacific
Ocean each antenna was. Could the beam have been reflecting off
the ground before the edge of the cliff and the curtain array looking
at the saltwater at an effective height of the supporting poles PLUS
the height of the cliff?
Tom N4KG
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
________________________________________________________________________
Where do you get ICE bandpass filters & beverage matching boxes? The
same place that pays for the hosting of this list: The eHam Store.
Order online at http://store.eham.net.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|