Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Busting Packet

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Busting Packet
From: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 21:28:09 -0500

There are still system flaws and uniques sometimes
are marked as -B.  I noticed this in my 2000 CQWW
SSB report.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Naumann - N5NJ
To: W8JI@contesting.com; cq-contest@contesting.com; Ed
Sent: 7/27/2001 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Busting Packet


I'm anticipating that K3EST will make a statement here at some point in
the
near future, but this erroneous comment regarding Uniques needs
correction:

>> It's a shame those contacts don't count, it is the careful
listening/good
receiver penalty at work, hi hi. <<

No credit for QSOs with Unique stations are removed from anyone's log.

They are simply marked as unique with a "U" on the UBN report.  No
credit is
removed calls marked as Unique.

Please read that statement carefully.  It says that no one loses credit
for
working a unique station.

There are various methods used to determine whether or not calls are
Bad,
and if that occurs, they are marked as "-B" on the UBN report and credit
is
removed.

If you have dispute about a callsign in your log that is marked "-B",
send
your supporting info to:

questions@cqww.com

73,
Bob N5NJ




----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@akorn.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>; "Ed" <k4sb@mindspring.com>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Busting Packet


>
> > just a couple of thoughts. First, we went to computer log checking,
now
> > ARRL requires Cabrillo, someone came up with "uniques" and now there
are
>
> We always work several uniques in contests, sometimes very low
> power poor antenna stations that no one else manages to hear. i'm
> sure others do the same.
>
> It's a shame those contacts don't count, it is the careful
> listening/good receiver penalty at work, hi hi.
>
> Recently a bunch of people busted ZL3REX's call in a contest, and
> a KL7 got it right. Since ZL3REX was not in the callbook (even
> though it is the good call) and ZL2REX was in the callbook (even
> though it is a bad call) all the people who logged the contact
> incorrectly got credit.
>
> Anyone who logged it wrong received credit. At least one person
> who logged it right had it tossed. I'd bet this happens more than we
> imagine.
>
> 73, Tom W8JI
> W8JI@contesting.com
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com





-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>