Brian:
Actually the rebar cage in either is the same. It should be separate
from the tower section that is embedded in the concrete. I would not
recommend to anyone that they use the embedded tower section as a
substitute for reinforcement of the concrete base.
Hank / KR7X
alsopb wrote:
>
> I have been following this thread and see only tangential references
> to the type of pier pin installations I've seen.
>
> First, they use a flat bottom plate on the concrete. I doubt that
> these rotate at all to relieve the moment at the bottom. Kurt's
> analysis looked at this and concluded it almost is equivalent to a
> burried installation.
>
> Second, I see no reference to the complicated rebar cage that one has
> to put in the hole to make up for the missing tower section.
>
> It appears that this type of "pier pin" base is the worst of both
> worlds.
>
> 73 de Brian/K3KO
>
> Hank Lonberg wrote:
>
> > With the pier pin base there is no moment developed at the base.
>
> List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
> for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
> 96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A
> HREF="http://www.ChampionRadio.com";>
> www.ChampionRadio.com</A>
>
> -----
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A
HREF="http://www.ChampionRadio.com";>
www.ChampionRadio.com</A>
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|