Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Guy tension

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Guy tension
From: jnipper@southeast.net (James Nipper)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:31:10 -0500
WHAT ??????????????????????????????????

73 DE   JIM   K4PYT  


David J. Windisch wrote:
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> 
> DON'T READ THIS AND ATTEMPT TO EXPERIMENT UNLESS YOU ARE A BIG BOY WHO CAN
> THINK FOR HIMSELF AND KNOW WTF YOU ARE DOING AROUND TOWERS, GUYS, ANCHORS,
> CRANES, CABLES, ANTENNAS, SPRINGS, WEIGHTS, AND SO FORTH.    AROUND STUFF
> LIKE THIS, WIN-DEADHEAT-PLACE-SHOW TRANSLATES TO WIN-LOSE-LOSE-LOSE, LIKE
> RACING A LOCOMOTIVE TO A GRADE-CROSSING.   IF THIS OFFENDS YOU, YOU NEEDED
> TO BE OFFENDED.
> 
> At the shop, we have 30ft ceilings, cranes, cables, weights, scales, etc.,
> with which I can play after hours.
> 
> There is a definite repeatable correlation between cable tension due to
> vertical deadweight and torque-wrench readings (on several different
> wrenches with differing ranges), using a simple fixture with cable contact
> points (grade-8 bolts) a foot apart, and a hole for the wrench tongue midway
> between the contact points.
> 
> The method 'worked' with cable sizes fron 1/16in to 1/2in., and even on a
> couple sizes of nylon rope with pipe slid on them for stiffness at contact
> points.
> 
> Time for peer review.   Since I'm not an ME, there is a virtual certainty
> that I've overlooked *something* in this uncharted territory.    I'm not
> disclosing much detail cuz .. well, you can probably think why, under rules
> of sinustific experimentation.
> 
> *Save the flames, pls*.    See the disclaimer above.
> 
> 73, Dave, K3BHJ


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>