To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? |
From: | T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com) |
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:02:14 EST |
In a message dated 3/12/01 6:44:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, rthorne@tcac.net writes: << Danny: How do you think the R6000 or R8 would perform over a steel roof. The base of the antenna would be about 2 to 3 feet above the roof. >> It's too low and antenna would not match. Probably will shift down due the coupling of those 49 inches radials to big ground plain. It will work at 8 feet and up and but cannot say for sure, I did not try.... 73's Danny T93M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials?, T93m@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Advertising Opportunity, Fred Hopengarten |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials?, T93m@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials?, Richard McGaver |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |