[TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn

Towertalk

[TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn

from [k4ydk]

To:	<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn
From:	k4ydk@wpmedia.com (k4ydk)
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 99 21:29:51 -0500

>From what I have seen the last few days on this SIG. I wouldn't buy a 
Rohn tower. If that many people have experienced that much 'shoddy' 
workmanship, I'll spend my money somewhere else. Thanks for the info, 
73-Mike

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn, k4ydk <= [TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn, Bill Wall [TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn, K7LXC@aol.com

Previous by Date:	[TowerTalk] DMSO in WD-40 (NOT), Paul McInnish - K4BET
Next by Date:	[TowerTalk] Three Lightning Protection Clarifications Please?, <eDoc@netzero.net (DavidC)
Previous by Thread:	[TowerTalk] 160 Ant, Tom Osborne
Next by Thread:	[TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn, Bill Wall
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]