Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] 402CD + Skyhawk

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 402CD + Skyhawk
From: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:21:19 -0700

I don't know how useful this will be for you.  But here is how
I'm configuring a single tower HF antenna system for 40 through
10 meters.

I live on a 192 foot AARZT hilltop with broad, relatively flat
river (wash) valleys extending out 5 to 8 miles in the important
directions.  I'm putting up a 70 foot tower.  At the top will be
a full sized three element 40 interlaced with a full sized three
element 30 on 40 foot boom (2 feedlines).  At the 40 foot level
on a tic ring rotator will be a 12 element LPDA coverng 14 to 30
MHz (30 foot boom, one feedline).

The 30 / 40 interactions have been accounted for in the design of
the antenna so there won't be a problem there.  The only
significant interaction I'm expecting between the two separate
antennas is on 15 meters.  Since I can rotate them independently,
I can eliminate that one when necessary.

So there you have it.  One tower, two antennas, three feedlines
covering all ham bands from 7 to 30 MHz with rotatable 20ish dB
F/B patterns on all bands.

73, Eric  N7CL



>From: KI7WX@aol.com
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 21:36:41 EDT
>
>Well I must admit it was a longshot to find someone that had
>tried the Skyhawk and the XM240.  Thanks to those that reponded,
>nothing new but I do appreciate the time it takes to type in an
>answer.
>
>Let me try another angle at the same issue and see what folks
>are doing/thinking.  I hope it's not a waste of bandwidth, but
>effective one tower stations are interesting to the majority of
>TT participants I think.
>
>Assuming a 100-110 foot tower with goal to cover 10-40M
>effectively.  The approach that makes sense to me is a three
>stack of tribanders spaced about 30-35 feet and a 40M 2L yagi up
>top.  This has worked for a lot of guys already so very little
>reinventing of the wheel to be done.  The assumption, however,
>is that the 40M 2L can coexist well with the tribander and have
>sufficient bandwidth to cover 40M.  The latter pretty much rules
>out the linear loaded 2L 40 shorties and leaves the Cushcraft.
>I don't THe 402CD seemed to do this nicely while the XM240 may
>not.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>