To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] (Was) C3 vs tennadyne |
From: | kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin) |
Date: | Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:02:27 -0500 |
>This is an oversimplification -- it may still have the same forward gain, >but it could be losing a lot more often in pile-ups. . > Oooohhh....you mean there are pile-up efficient antennas and not-pile-up efficient antennas? Cool! Sigh....I want to contest, but my antenna wants to rag chew. :-) kg5u -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] C3 vs tennadyne, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Recent experience w/tower permit in city of Denver?, David Feldman |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] (Was) C3 vs tennadyne, Curtis, David B |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] KLM factory number, michael w. elliott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |