Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Lightning 'porcupines' & rods

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Lightning 'porcupines' & rods
From: kn4lf@webtv.net (Thomas Giella)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT)

--WebTV-Mail-5448-82
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit


 Call up NASA lightning research, University Of Florida Lightning
Research Center and lightning rods, on the search engine of your choice,
to find info on porcupine lightning rods. Also the Wireman and
Polyphaser have literature available. NASA and most telephone and power
companies use the porcupine lightning rods here in Florida. All the
latest cutting edge lightning research is done here in Florida. 
 Lightning rods attract lightning, as all small diameter pointy grounded
metal objects have a difficult time draining excess electrical charge
buildup, allowing a leader charge to move skyward, versus the much
larger surface area of a porcupine. Basically it's an interface
resistance thing.

73 to all, Thom KN4LF.


--WebTV-Mail-5448-82
Content-Description: signature
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

<html><bgsound src="http://www.vbe.com/~tinyman/midiarch/folowsun.mid";
loop="infinite"><body background=
"http://members.tripod.com/~webtv/lite9.jpg";
text="white"><b><clock></clock></b>
</html>

    


--WebTV-Mail-5448-82
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Received: from mailsorter-102-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.99) by
        postoffice-251.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 1999
        05:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-towertalk@contesting.com>
Received: from contesting.com (dayton.akorn.net [216.1.128.73]) by
        mailsorter-102-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
        with ESMTP id FAA18774; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 05:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dayton.com (dayton.akorn.net [216.1.128.73]) by
        contesting.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA26997; Wed, 18 Aug
        1999 08:22:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dayton.com (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Wed,
        18 Aug 1999 08:19:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Brian Smithson" <brian_smithson@vds.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Lightning 'porcupines' & rods
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:14:07 -0400
Message-ID: <000301bee973$2b6bd2b0$730516ac@brians>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C


I've seen several posts in the past praising the virtues
of 'porcupines' to 'drain off charge' before a strike can
occur. I've also seen at least as many claim it is all
bunk. I must admit it seems reasonable, but not if a
lightning rod 'attracts' strikes. I have no background
here - just a software guy! Does anyone know where 
I can find out about any studies, etc. to what the 
scoop is?

-Brian n8wrl

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--WebTV-Mail-5448-82--

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>