Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR
From: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 05:48:39 -0700
>From: K7LXC@aol.com

>The X-9 boom-to-mast
>bracket is right up against one element and as I recall, the antenna is out
>off balance to begin with so moving the bracket further back will only
>exacerbate the situation.
>
[...]
>
>BTW, is it the 402CD or a new XM240? While the new antenna is basically
>beefed up mechanically, my limited experience has been that it's also
>different electrically. The one XM240 that I installed under a TH11 showed
>MUCH MORE interaction than I've ever seen with a 402CD. Tom, N6BT, of Force
>12 concurs with my observation.

[PURELY SUBJECTIVE OBSERVATION ALERT]

The more and more I read about the "new Cushcraft," the more I
appreciate what Force 12 has brought to the amateur antenna
marketplace.  Thanks, Tom!

[END PURELY SUBJECTIVE OBSERVATION ALERT]

73, Dick

--
Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of Reno)
Visit http://www.qsl.net/cvrc/



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>