I would get a BIG bottle of headache medicine if you really move there. You
are going to need it . . . !! Those kind of locations are simply hostile to
ham radio and not worth the effort, in my opinion. Easier to find another
location that is more friendly to your plans.
Stan w7ni@teleport.com
G. Spinelli wrote:
> I'm considering the purchase of a 2 acre parcel in a covenant controlled
> rural area. The subdivision is just 2 years old, with a few homes
> built, and several currently under construction.
>
> The covenants allow outside antennas, but there is a 35 foot height
> limit on all structures, and certain requirements about placement of
> structures on the lot. The goal is to preserve the mountain views,
> without being too restrictive on use of the property. In a brief
> discussion with the sales agent the topic of crank-up towers came up.
> She indicated that this wouldn't be a problem as long as it wasn't
> extended all the time, and it was properly located on the lot, i.e.
> can't be in front of the house. The lots are zoned for horses, so I do
> expect some people to build structures other than the one single family
> home allowed on each lot.
>
> Before I get serious about this lot I want to submit a written proposal
> to the "Architectural Control Committee" (which is the developer) and
> to the county, seeking a variance. The county has a 35 foot limit, also
> for the purpose of preserving views. I plan to make the sale
> contingent upon use of the property for amateur radio purposes as stated
> in the written proposal.
>
> Please, I don't want to clutter the reflector with opinions! I would
> like to receive samples of similar requests for a variance which have
> worked for other people. I have detailed pictures of what the
> installation / project will look like, and am pursuing getting the
> engineering specs for the tower I plan to use, US Tower HDX-572. I'm
> assuming the county will want to see something more than just a letter.
>
> Advice and counsel would be appreciated via e-mail. I'll summarize this
> project at a later time and report back to the reflector.
>
> Thanks and Happy Holidays.
>
> Gene Spinelli
> Boulder, CO
>
> P.S. The property is not located in Boulder County, aka "The People's
> Republic of Boulder".
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|