Davis, WA3GIN:
Your not having all the facts, letters and notes of phone calls it is
obvious your remarks are uninformed and shallow without fact.
I'll defend your right of free speech, and therefore you can defend
mine.
BTW, please quote where name calling and idiot remarks was done.
I think an appology is in order from the uninformed!
BTW, a nice note from Steve this AM thanked me for my off-reflector
remarks and he's going to take some action.
-.- (as you say)
At 10:17 AM 10/20/98 -0400, David Jordan wrote:
>
>
>Folks,
>
>The more competition in the business the better prices and products for
>the consumer. If
>Steve Best decides to tank his company that just leaves less choices for
>all of us.
>
>Perhaps we need a rule on this reflector that says if you haven't owned
>and run a company
>the size of the one you wish to bash you should take you commentary and
>stuff it.
>
>Keeping pressure on a company to maintain high standards of product
>integrity is a good thing...bashing a company with name calling and
>idiotic remarks that don't aid in solutioning
>obvious or lingering concerns doesn't help the company or any of us
>consumers.
>
>- . -
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|