Definitely worth doing. The BA is pre-computer analysis. The CA is
computer optimized. Both of my HiGain 105s are 105CAs, even though one
of them started out in life as a BA, but was installed as a CA.
The reason they look different is due to the increased gain and F/B from
the closer first director/ driven/refector spacing.
BTW, the same is true for the 205 BA/Ca and 155 BA/CA. Convert them
all!! I have 2 of each (205CA, 155CA, 105CA).
Bill, N3RR
MBecker@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just downloaded the dimensions to convert my 105BA beam into the 105CA
> and noticed that some of the new dimensions are much different from the 105BA.
> Does anyone have any experience with this and is it worth doing? Thanks.
>
> Mike, KT3U
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|