Stan:
I have sent my complete set of NCJ's to ARRL HQ for
conversion to a CD-ROM. I sent them in August. I was
scanning through issues as I was making certain that all
were there and believe that I saw the article you are
thinking of.
I have another set that I will check when my ARRL work at
the ITU Conference is over.
Tod, K0TO
-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Griffiths <w7ni@teleport.com>
To: J. B. Black <blackj@agcs.com>; towertalk@contesting.com
<towertalk@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum mast
Hi OM,
It may well have been published in the March/April issue of
1993 NCJ. It turns
out that particular issue is missing from my files and I
can't check it to see.
Can someone else check it and let us know if it was
published in tht NCJ issue?
Stan w7ni@teleport.com
J. B. Black wrote:
> Hi Stan,
> On Tom's site, in his article reprint, shows a footnote
> ( http://www.ConsultPR.com/mast.htm )
>
> for an article from you for March / april 1993; could this
> be the one? I hope that Tom will post it as well. It
> is great to have these resources available to everyone.
>
> Thanks
>
> Stan Griffiths wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I wrote such an article in 1992 and submitted to K5RC
for publishing the
> > NCJ. I can't remember if it ever got published or not.
Anyway, I still
> > have the orginal and I plan to mail you a copy of it and
also send a copy
> > to K7LXC so he can add it to his collection of
"available reprints" if he
> > sees some merit in it. I am also sending a copy to Tom,
K5RC, in case he
> > wants to put it on his web site along with the similar
article he wrote
> > and the first article I wrote on mast strength
calculations.
> >
> > So, yes, someone has seriously looked into an aluminum
vs steel mast
> > comparison already and my article is complete with
calculations and
> > estimated pricing of the options available in 1992.
Weight is also
> > considered and it is not as favorable toward aluminum as
you might think
> > because it takes a lot more volume of aluminum the make
up for what it
> > lacks in yield strength. My paper clearly shows this.
> >
> > In the back of my mind, I think that article actually
DID get published
> > in the NCJ and it would be worthwhile digging it out
right now to read
> > since it addresses exactly what everyone is talking
about right now. I
> > will see if I can find it in any back issue I have and
post it here if I
> > find it.
> >
> > Stan w7ni@teleport.com
> >
> > w8ji.tom wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone ever done a strength vs weight vs cost analysis
of common mast
> > > sizes?
> > >
> > > 73 Tom
--
FAQ on WWW:
http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:
http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|