> I've come to the general conclusion that here in SE Michigan,
> greater heights are needed for some reason. Antennas lower
> than 40' on 10, 50' on 15, and 60' on 20 seem to be cosistently
> poor performers. Evidenced by having to always swing a higher
> antenna south to crack even medium size SA pileups.
>
> Hey, you don't suppose these opinions are a sinister plot to
> keep us at the bottom of the pile, do you?
Hi Steve and all,
The sign on my wall says............
"The best antenna is the one that makes us happiest, no matter how it
really works."
Watch carefully, and see if that isn't true.
73 Tom
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|