Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re: Weird Balun Damage

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: Weird Balun Damage
From: rikik@inter.net.il (rikik@inter.net.il)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:56:31 -0700
Sounds like the  antenna may have suffered damage from lightning. Just a
possibility, that seems to correspond with the damage described..

73,
Riki, 4X4NJ

Pete Smith wrote:

> I use a homebrew common mode choke at the 40m. feedpoint on my C-4 -- it's
> the fairly standard 50 beads of #73 material on small-diameter teflon
> insulated coax.
> I run about 1200 watts output, and the C-4's 40 meter driven element is
> tuned for CW, so when I operate on phone the SWR is pretty high (though
> still within the range of the SB-220's plate tank).
>
> Yesterday, I was inspecting the choke after bringing the antenna down for
> modification.  To my surprise, there was a hole through the tape wrap at
> about the middle of its length.  I surmised that it might have been damaged
> by the birds that perch on the antenna in great numbers, but when I removed
> the wrapping I'm not sure.  First, at the point where the tape was damaged,
> 2-3 beads are missing, the teflon jacket is open, and the braid is severely
> disrupted.  The cable retains continuity and is not shorted.  Looking very
> closely, the teflon appears to have been melted, and there is some evidence
> of burning inside the jacket (though this may be discoloration from
> oxidation of the exposed braid).
>
> Even more mysterious, about 10 of the beads adjacent to the opening, on the
> antenna side of it, have been shattered into 4-6 pieces each, even though
> the tape outer wrapping is intact.  There is no evidence of heating other
> than the teflon right at "ground zero."
>
> Anyone out there experienced a similar failure, or understand what's going
> on here?  Does it make sense that a failure due to bead heating would occur
> in the middle of the string of beads rather than at one end?  If this is
> due to bead heating, does the high SWR on phone make the heating worse?  Is
> there a design change I can make (different beads, for example) that would
> maintain adequate common mode choking on 40m. while reducing the heating?
> Should I expect to find similar damage to the chokes at the feedpoints of
> my 80 - meter array, which also operates at high SWR on the 75 meter end of
> the band?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR
> n4zr@contesting.com
>
> "That's WEST Virginia.  Thanks and 73"
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>