>At 05:26 AM 8/31/98 -0400, you wrote:
>...
>>Think about the guy situation for a moment. In an early Rohn catalog that I
>>have which is dated September 1969, Rohn specifies the Gross allowable load
>>on the bottom section of 45G to be 19,440 pounds! I know they don't publish
>>this number or any other number telling you the Gross allowable load on the
>>bottom section in the current catalogs. I also don't think the materials or
>>design of 45G tower sections have changed either. So if you tensioned all 6
>>of your guys to 10 percent of their breaking strength, added the weight of
>>the tower, beams, rotator, guys, coax, etc, how much is it? About 4000
>>pounds, maybe. I would not worry for an instant that I was putting too much
>>weight on the bottom section, even by adding two more sets of guys.
>
>But what if the wind blows sufficiently to put, say, 3500 pounds tension on
>each of the windward guys? Suddenly, there's a lot more than just the
>static load. I also wonder some about the stability of the bolted
>inter-section attachments. Looks like we need that PE!
>
>
>73, Pete Smith N4ZR
>In wild, wonderful, fairly rare WEST Virginia
Hi Pete,
Yes, we DO need that PE.
If the wind DID blow enough to put 3500 pounds on the windward guys, how
strong of a wind would that be? 200 MPH? I don't know, but I'll bet you
would see some other failure before the bottom section buckled, such as all
the elements blown off the antennas or a guy anchor uprooted.
Also, with that tension on the windward guys, there is probably no tension
in the other ones since the tower would deflect toward them slightly putting
a little slack in them.
This is the stuff a good PE can answer without guessing . . .
Stan w7ni@teleport.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|