Scott Bullock wrote:
I don't appreciate others posting this licensing crap onto the
reflector either, like k5rc, I too get 80+ e-mail a day without seeing
this stuff.
Maybe what needs to be done to make these people listen is to have them
automatically banned from the reflector for posting this stuff. Maybe
that will smarten them up a little bit and make them understand that
others are more interested in TOWERS and appropriate subjects than
their replies and views of what they think ham licenses should be.
Flame away, i've got triple lined kevlarbestos undies, but do it
privately, so I can be sure to put your replies in the trash
box......where they belong.
Now let's get on to helping others with their tower projects.
Scott
KA1CLX
Guys, Scott is right. His relative inexperience as a ham, plus the
advantages he will gain are such that for him, matters more directly
related to the TT purpose can only serve to help him.
Obviously, considering his remarks about his "undies", he is very
sensitive concerning this matter.
Return flames would therefore not be appropriate. Let's show that we
are gentlemen and can act as such when confronted with messages such
as his.
73
Ed
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|