Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: [TowerTalk] X9 40m add on kit

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [TowerTalk] X9 40m add on kit
From: n4cc@ezl.com (Greg - N4CC)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:24:18 -0500
I think your message is totally uncalled for....and you owe Steve
an apology.  73 de Greg-N4CC

At 02:24 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>      To Will, Terry and the entire TowerTalk group:
>>
>>      As President of Cushcraft, I try to avoid getting into all of the day
>>      to day details of things such as the content of our instruction
>>      manuals and web page.
>
>Translation: Don't trust anything we put in writing.
>
>>      I do this for two reasons - one is to let
>>      people excel to the best of there abilities and the other is not to
>>      force my opinions on them.
>
>Translation: I am not responsible for the quality of my company's products.
>
>>       I quite simply did not realize that we had
>>      formally announced a 2 element kit to this extent.
>
>Translation: I don't check the facts before making public statements.
>
>>      I also don't want to start blaming Art for everything bad that had
>>      happened in the past because he did a lot of great things for
>>      Cushcraft.
>
>Translation: I'm going to wait a full sentence before blaming Art for this.
>
>>      He was solely responsible for the manual and web page
>>      content
>
>Translation: It was all Art's fault.
>
>>       , however, I still stand behind my statement in the last
>>      message:
>
>Translation: I am never wrong.
>
>>      "These statements were made by Art without him or the rest of our
>>      organization being sure that a two element kit would work. I suspect
>>      Art had meant that a two element add on kit was our design
>>      goal rather than it being a promise."
>
>Translation: We assume that our customers are telepathic.
>
>>      I also stand behind the following statements:
>>
>>      "As far as the X940 being only a single element - our engineering
>>      effort was lead by Danny (T93M) who designed both the X7 and the X9.
>>      He tried to implement a two element solution but it was not
>>      significantly better than a single element and it degraded the X9
>>      performance on the other bands.  We were not willing to make the
>>      performance sacrifice on the other bands and we were not willing to
>>      provide an inferior two element solution.
>
>Translation: You should have modeled our design before placing your order.
>
>>      Had we implemented an inferior two element solution, most users in
>the
>>      amateur community may have never noticed.
>
>Translation: Our customers are ignorant and never discuss antennas with each
>other.
>
>>      However, that's not the way Cushcraft operates - period."
>
>Translation: Just because our competitors can make 2 elements work well
>doesn't mean we can.
>
>>      Feedback is always welcome and appreciated.  I will deal with any
>>      comments this community has to offer fairly and with honesty.
>
>Translation: As exemplified by this letter.
>
>>      73
>>      Steve Best
>>      President
>>      Cushcraft Corporation
>
>
>
>I assume that the original message was a prank or a spoof, but just could
>not resist annotating it. Someone out there has a great sense of humor...
>
>     Dave, AA6YQ
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>