--------------04BDF661E4AE7FC2B6ADB89E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Tom Rauch wrote -snip-
> My grounded plummer's delight 5 element 20 meter beam was useless
> during foul weather (it was at 160 feet, the highest antenna on the
> stack), while lower antennas were pretty quiet. After I installed a
> tall 2 meter vertical above the yagi, it quieted right down and the
> vertical was useless. Both were dc grounded.
Tom-
I have heard others comment about stacked beams, noting the upper one is
noisier. I wonder if this effect is simply static discharge as from a
spike used for lightning protection. That is, does an antenna always
suffer higher noise than when protected by a "spike" mounted above it?
73-
Fred Roberts, W6TKV
Riverside, CA
--------------04BDF661E4AE7FC2B6ADB89E
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<I>Tom Rauch wrote -snip-</I>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE><I>My grounded plummer's delight 5 element 20 meter
beam was useless</I>
<BR><I>during foul weather (it was at 160 feet, the highest antenna on
the</I>
<BR><I>stack), while lower antennas were pretty quiet. After I installed
a</I>
<BR><I>tall 2 meter vertical above the yagi, it quieted right down and
the</I>
<BR><I>vertical was useless. Both were dc grounded.</I></BLOCKQUOTE>
Tom-
<P>I have heard others comment about stacked beams, noting the upper one
is noisier. I wonder if this effect is simply static discharge as
from a spike used for lightning protection. That is, does an antenna
always suffer higher noise than when protected by a "spike" mounted above
it?
<P>73-
<BR>Fred Roberts, W6TKV
<BR>Riverside, CA
<BR> </HTML>
--------------04BDF661E4AE7FC2B6ADB89E--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|