I agree. Besides, now that you've told us all how to subvert it, the filter
is useless...
73, Dick, WC1M
-----Original Message-----
From: Dick.Flanagan. <dick@libelle.com>
To: K7LXC@aol.com <K7LXC@aol.com>
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Antenna analyzers
>At 5:52 PM -0800 1/30/98, K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
>
>> With some chagrin I am letting you know that I am having a helluva
time
>>posting the results of the antenna analyzer comments. It seems that our
>>keyword filter for TowerTalk includes the word 'tango echo sierra tango'
(get
>>it? If I spell it out this message will get bounced) in order to keep
those
>>pesky te*t ("is anybody getting this?") posts from going to the reflector.
>>Unfortunately it also looks up 'tango echo sierra tango' in the body of
the
>>message and bounces everything with that word in it.
>
>I think this filter is poorly thought out, Steve. What if I want to run
>some T*E*S*T*S between two antennas, distribute some T*E*S*T results, ask
>for help preparing for the annual Simulated Emergency T*E*S*T or simply ask
>how to T*E*S*T a given hypothesis?
>
>Nice idea, Steve, but I don't think we can consider the word T*E*S*T to be
>a universal evil or prima facia evidence of worthless content.
>
>73, Dick
>
>--
>Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of Reno)
>Visit http://www.qsl.net/w7di/
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|