| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Radials, resonance and the MFJ259 |
| From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC) |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Dec 1997 12:18:43 EST |
In a message dated 97-12-18 11:55:48 EST, leeson@ix.netcom.com writes:
> It would be a neat addition to SWR bridges to have a means of turning
> off the oscillator so you could be sure that the meter dropped to zero.
> This could even be automated by pulsing the oscillator at a fairly high
> rate and looking for detector output when there shouldn't be any (MFJ,
> are you reading the mail?).
Other MFJ-259 upgrades:
1. Better battery holder. Does anyone have one that ISN'T broken?
Anyone else? Personally I'd be happy to pay more for an upgraded one.
73, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Radials, resonance and the MFJ259, Leeson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Radials, resonance and the MFJ259, Pat Barthelow |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Radials, resonance and the MFJ259, yo3ctk |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Radials, resonance and the MFJ259, K4SB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |