Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Gap Antennas

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Gap Antennas
From: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 19:07:01 EST
In a message dated 97-12-16 17:58:05 EST, ATanner283@aol.com writes:

>  I would appreciate any coments, pro or con about the current stable of Gap
>  antennas. I am considering the voyager for 160, 80, and 40. 

    A bunch of us used a GAP multi-band vertical for a 160M contest a couple
of years ago. We went to the ocean and heard EVERYTHING! It was awesome.
Unfortunately we could only work about 1/3 of the stations we heard so we
figured it was about 30% efficient. It was used subsequently on 80 and 40 and
worked better there than on 160.

73,  Steve  K7LXC

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>