Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] 204BA NEW Beta vs OLD Beta match

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 204BA NEW Beta vs OLD Beta match
From: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK)
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 19:34:23 -0400
At 06:15 PM 9/7/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Towertalk readers, if you have researched this revision, and know the
>motivation please share it with the reflector....it does not appear to have
>influenced element lengths then vs now so I guess it isn't a matching
>thang.....but, if it means I couple more watts into the driven element with
>the new version, and might be louder - heah, I wanna know!!! I am rebulding
>the antenna now, and it is a perfect time to do this....
>

As near as I can tell, the reason for the new beta is to allow adjustment 
for the "174CA Option," a set dimensions for operation of the antenna on 
17 Meters.  According to my (new) 204BA manual, the "174BA" has the 
following characteristics: 

          Gain .......................... 8.35 dBi
          Front-to-back ................. 24.4 dBi
          VSWR ............................ 1.06:1
          boom length (active) ............... 21'
          longest element ............... 18' 6.5"
          turning radius ..................... 18'

I seriously doubt the gain or efficiency is any better with the new beta. 



73, 

   ... Joe Subich, W8IK  ex-AD8I
       <w8ik@ibm.net>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>