> I'd like to comment on this, tho. In my four+ decades of of CW
> operation, I've never thought of it as being ridiculous.
Hi, Rod. Boy does it sound weird to say that. My last word on this,
'cause it doesn't really pertain to TT, and I was probably out of
line for making the comment anyway, but I heartily agree on the use
of it on CW. It sounds and reads silly on voice or in print.
And please don't anyone think I am supporting the "Q signals were
designed for CW" nonsense. Mine was a very narrowly and admittedly
inappropriately aimed comment.
Now about those owls...
73, Rod N4SI
The DXer formerly known as N9AKE
(c) 5 November, 1996
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|