To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | wind force design criteria |
From: | w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths) |
Date: | Wed, 7 Aug 1996 02:41:35 -0700 (PDT) |
> >For interest - in the UK, most of the towers are crank-up / tilt-over and >the standard ratings are published at 85 mph. As an example, my 18m >(heavy-duty) tower is rated to 11.5 sq ft at 85mph unguyed - I think the 24m >one comes in at about 7 sq ft unguyed and around 27sq ft guyed. > >73, > >Andy Cook, G4PIQ. >g4piq@blacksheep.org > ---------- Now these sound like reasonable ratings. Crankup manufacturers in the US should follow the UK example. Stan w7ni@teleport.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Crankup-tiltover towers, Chris Pedder |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Wasps, Tom Lindtveit |
Previous by Thread: | wind force design criteria, Cook, Andy, COOKAR2 |
Next by Thread: | wind force design criteria, Henry Knoll |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |