Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Tuned speaker revisited

To: n4is@comcast.net, "JC(Jose Carlos) via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>, Ron Spencer <ron.spencer@zoho.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Tuned speaker revisited
From: JAMES WOLF via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: JAMES WOLF <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:44:58 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
JC,

After my own initial guffaws at Ron's comment, I now think that what he was 
getting at is that the signal and the noise arriving at any collective device 
doesn't care what collects it.  Referencing his comment about the binoculars 
being about to see a star that the naked eye cannot. Its the same with an 
antenna; the binoculars can see something because the lens capture area is much 
larger than the human eye.   

My own experience, (and I have not built a resonant speaker), is that even 
individual room acoustics can make the difference between hearing a signal and 
not. Even the type of noise, atmospheric or man made, (for me), can change what 
the audio filter frequency where I want to listen.  

Jim - KR9U

> " SNR is independent of the radio, the antenna or anything in between. The
> SNR at a dipole is the same as at a 4 element beam. "

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>