Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Tuned cw speaker

To: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Tuned cw speaker
From: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 11:59:50 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>

I don't know if this is related to Tree's question or not but I suspect it is.

In 1986 I went to operate CQWWSSB at Terry Baxter's (N6CW) old spot at VP2VCW. I brought an analog tape recorder and taped several hours of my 10 and 15 meter runs in the contest.

After the contest and after I submitted my log to CQWW, I was astonished to see how many times the analog recorder clearly picked up callsigns and qso information that I struggled with or missed entirely while operating. The reverse was also true - occasionally, but less frequently, my ears picked up callsigns and qso info that was
inaudible on the recorder tape.

A few years later when I was in Seattle, WA and I was taking pictures of sunsets with my digital camera, I was amazed to see how much less colorful and dull the sunsets were on than what I remembered seeing with my eyes. The opposite was true when I had taken pictures of sunsets in 1988 from Aruba (P40V) where the analog film showed wavelengths of color that I never saw. Frankly, the sunsets were more striking on analog film than my eyes could see, but the opposite was true with pictures of sunsets taken on my digital camera one year later in Seattle.

I don't know the disparity between I heard and did not hear with audio at HF frequencies was/is related to the disparity I saw between the colors of the sunset in pictures taken with my analog camera vs. what I saw with my eyes, but they are all waves of energy being propagated in different modes and then interpreted in our brain.

Maybe someone can enlighten me as to what I was experiencing and why such differences between what I heard/saw and what the equipment picked up? And is this in fact similar to what Tree described? It sure seems that way.

Tnx & 73

Bob, KQ2M



On 2026-02-07 11:14, Tree wrote:
My take: for a SDR, if no signal was converted during the A to D stage,
there will be no signal to "dig out" during the D to A stage

I find this very interesting. I can't say I totally understand the issue well enough to have an educated opinion. If it is indeed true that going into the digital domain eliminates the effectiveness of a "CW Speaker" - I think that is fascinating and makes me wonder what else is being missed by
the human ear.

Tree N6TR

On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 8:17 AM Ron Spencer via Topband <
topband@contesting.com> wrote:

I think Dave and Adrian's conclusion is correct. My take: for a SDR, if no signal was converted during the A to D stage, there will be no signal to "dig out" during the D to A stage. No amount of signal processing or noise reduction will help since there is nothing there. Nothing is buried in the
noise floor.



Ron  N4XD


Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>