Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low Dipoles

To: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Low Dipoles
From: KØKX Mark <mx88888@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:12:48 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Please----Nebraska would be too easy as the propagation is quite good there.
Try central Minnesota and trust me the only EU stations worked will be just
a few in mid to late December.
This is 50 years of me operating from Minnesota speaking with a rather good
160 transmit antenna.
Thank you Rob for the reality check.

Merry Xmas
Mark
K0KX

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:28 AM Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I do take offence at people suggesting that I am somehow lying about the
> > results I have always had with a 160m Dipole at 50ft !
>
> I don't think anyone believes you are lying, but perhaps instead, that
> you seem to imply that your experience can be generalized and that you
> are therefore, misguided.  This is because your results run counter to
> decades of experience and observations by countless others when it
> comes to antennas and 160 meters.  I invite you to come to the middle
> of North America, Nebraska let's say, and set up the exact same
> antenna in a rural location and report how it performs after a full
> winter operating season.
>
> Merry Xmas
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>