| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Low Dipoles |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Dec 2020 02:55:47 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 12/12/2020 2:53 AM, Jim Brown wrote: I fully agree with observations that DX can arrive at higher angles. I should have added that low dipoles can be better RX antennas for high angle arrivals, since efficiency doesn't matter on RX, but it matters a LOT on TX. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Low Dipoles, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: The Stew Perry Top Band Distance Challenge, Lew Sayre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Low Dipoles, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Low Dipoles, donovanf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |