I am wondering if the air variable is flashing over. I am willing to bet that a
vacuum variable would correct the problem. I use two (2) Vacuum variables in an
Omega match.
73,
John, W4NU
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dale,
>
> The RF voltage is always looking at the far end (stuff on the end away from
> the tower base) to jump onto.
>
> *** Provide a deliberate, designed, long-term weather survivable metallic
> path to the boom of the highest yagi and provide a low R&X path from the
> boom to BOTH sides of at least one element at either END of the boom. This
> will drastically reduce current via unintended paths.
>
> You will have to retune the match.
>
> This is much easier for a parasitic element, where the center of an
> insulated element can be just strapped to the boom. But you should also
> replace the balun. It will remain a source of RF loss, even if it doesn't
> change value or burn up.
>
> RF current heating of a "balun" comes about because an engineer is only
> designing the balun for the performance at 40 or 20 meters. The R&X of such
> a device on 1.8 MHz can be quite low. I have measured one that worked FB on
> a tribander that was only 173 ohms on 160. That will get very hot at power
> and its effect on the tuning at the tower base can be enormous. And it is a
> guaranteed source of RF loss that throws away dB's of your amp's power. RF
> heating of a ferrite device gets to a point where the R&X characteristics
> suddenly fall off the table. 80 meters likely just doesn't quite get to
> that temperature because the R&X of the balun is higher on 80m
>
> You still may need to change that device for something with good stiff R&X
> at 160, so it will not heat up and change. The 160 RF will still try to go
> there. It just needs to be solidly blocked. See the Balun Designs 1116dx (x
> is one of 6 or 7 hardware configurations, same innards). Or go to K9YC's
> web site to make your own. Jim has some recent designs, excellent R&X for
> 160 based on a new monster #31 ferrite core & RG400.
>
> Good luck, 73, and stay safe from that virus,
>
> Guy K2AV
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:06 PM Dale Drake <daleaa1qd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here's my problem. I'm experiencing SWR problems
>> with 160M shunt feed on my tower. Using a gamma
>> match with HV air variable caps I am able adjust
>> the tap point to get a very nice SWR curve using
>> my AA-35 Zoom analyzer. The problem I having is
>> that when transmitting the SWR goes up with power
>> and if I key-down for very long the SWR rises
>> rapidly and takes off.
>>
>> My set up is 70ft Rohn 25 with about 22 feet of
>> mast above the top of the tower. At the top of
>> the mast is a Diamond 2M/440 vertical. At 15 feet
>> above the tower top is an XM-240 and 2 feet above
>> the tower top is a 4el SteppIR. The elements of
>> the SteppIR are fully retracted. All of the coax
>> and control lines are run from ground level inside
>> the tower up to the service loop. On the mast
>> above the tower the coax is tywrapped to the mast.
>> There are 60 ground radials with an average length
>> of 90ft. The reflector of the XM-240 is insulated
>> from the boom and the driven element is fed
>> through a Comtek 1:1 balun. All of the coax
>> shields are grounded at the tower base.
>>
>> I have an 80M gamma matched shunt on this tower
>> that plays FB with no weird SWR stuff going on.
>>
>> I suspect that what is causing my 160M trouble is
>> that RF is coupling through the 40M coax, through
>> the balun and into the driven element. Somehow the
>> coupling changes with power, which I don't
>> understand. I suspect that when I key-down and
>> the SWR takes off, the core in the balun is
>> getting hot and the magnetic properties are
>> shifting until it cools off and returns to normal.
>>
>> My plan to try to correct this problem is to
>> connect the center of the XM-240 reflector to the
>> boom and to mount a box at the XM-240 feed point
>> with 2 vacuum relays that I will use to connect
>> the driven element to the boom when I'm on160.
>> This will be a considerable effort and expense so
>> I'm looking for the group's input as to the
>> soundness of my plan or if there may be other
>> approaches that would be less difficult to try
>> first.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dale, AA1QD
>>
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
>> Reflector
>>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|