Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK..

To: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK..
From: Steven Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:52:02 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Isn’t it amazing that unless someone does it just as you did (old tech, no 
internet, output power limited by LORAN, etc.) that their achievement doesn’t 
quite make the grade? After all, nobody’s seen the trouble I’ve seen, right?
Spend a few quality moments reading On the Origin of Species. Then either get 
busy evolving or go extinct.
If the latter is your choice, please do it quietly. The rest of us are working 
new ones on Top Band on whatever mode they are available. And none of us wants 
to be distracted by your death-whine.
Steve, NN4T


Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 12, 2020, at 7:32 PM, Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net> wrote:
> 
> Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops.
> 
> What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8? 
> 
> That’s like telling CW guys that their achievements aren’t really noteworthy 
> compared to how the Sideband guys have done it.
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Feb 12, 2020, at 12:18 PM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> 
>> ”Although when someone announces an incredible achievement on top band that
>> could only be achieved using FT8, we need to be sure that it is not glossed
>> over that it doesn't make it necessarily a great lifetime achievement vs the
>> way others were doing it.  It isn't.”
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ed  N1UR
>> 
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>