Jeff,
Please ignore the negative comments.
FT8 is perfectly good. CW would have been harder but "better"! (i.e. more
valued by the old-timers.)
But with FT8 you've made more people happy!
73,
George,
AA7JV
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:11:29 -0600
"Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net> wrote:
I congratulate you on your effort. However there are many of us who do not
consider FT8 as a 'legitimate' QSO.
Doug
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
08 Nov 2019
Hi Gang
Jeff and I just got back from a one week "mini dx'pedition" to ZONE 2.
Three ferries and about a 2400km roundtrip drive to 50.112 North from PEI
was made with the express purpose of giving ZONE 2 to our JA 160m friends.
Prior to our trip, only one single JA station had ever managed a qso with
ZONE 2 on Topband and that was JA7HMZ about 35 years ago - so this zone was
much needed by most 160m JA dx'ers. Quite of few of our 160m JA friends
have been stuck at 39 zones on 160m for many years - so this was our chance
to help them get ZONE 2 for #40.
So without too much bandwidth - here is our report:
QRV 31 October to 04 November 2019
Roughly 350 stations worked on Topband - in 42 DXCC countries (we could have
worked more but we took lots of time off in order to sleep and then get up
for the JA window from about 0715z - 1110z.)
We tried some CW but signals were very very weak and FT8 proved the only
possible way to complete contacts to JA.
It was pretty exciting to work these (6) JA friends:
JF8QNF
JA8EAT
JA7NI
JA1BK
JA8WKE
JA3FYC
We decoded no other JA signals on our side- but we know we were decoded by
these other JA stations:
JH7PFD (two decodes)
JE6KYA (one decode)
JA1EOD (several decodes).
Epilogue:
We think that each JA qso that was made completed WAZ 40 on Topband for
these JA friends. (meaning ZONE 2 was most likely their last one needed).
Steve VK6IR called us on ON4KST chat saying he had been chasing ZONE 2 on
80m for 5BWAZ for 45 years and asked if we could work him on 80m. We did
not know about 80m since the antenna had not been tested for that band but,
after checking it with my analyst, I found it resonated at about 3778kHz.
Steve said he could not do SSB there - so I asked him if he could do
digital. YES! was his reply and we managed a qso on FT8 a few minutes
later.
After we uploaded our LOG FILE to LOTW (completed on 06 November) - within
minutes there were 37 DXCC entities instantly confirmed via LOTW - including
VK6IR and all (6) lucky JA friends we had worked.
So we are happy we helped some of our JA friends with WAZ 40 - and, at the
same time, we are a bit disappointed that we could not do more. The A/K
were lousy on nights one and two - things got better on night 3 when we
worked the first 4 JA's - nights 5 and 6 produced one JA qso each - meaning
JA8WKE and JA3FYC.
One amusing final fact - it was roughly a 2400km trip to there and back - so
this works out to about 400km per JA qso.
KOWABUNGA! but we had a great time trying this - and are pleased we had
some limited success in doing so.
We wish to mention our special thanks to Don Toman (K2KQ) and to Frank
Donovan (W3LPL) for their kind assistance with our antenna planning. Their
input and suggestions were invaluable in making this happen!
73/88 de Miriam (VY2NA) and Jeff VY2ZM
Email: K1ZM@aol.com
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|