Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts "outlawed" by ARRL

To: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts "outlawed" by ARRL
From: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:29:52 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
This is one of those topics that will create a firestorm of opinions.  We
just had a similar one about FT*.

The management of this list has decided not to support a similar discussion
at this time.

There are two ways to do this - I asked.  Or I have to go into moderation
mode which slows everything down for everyone.

Tree (who doesn't always like this job - but is willing to do it)

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:23 AM Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Actually, I think this topic is very relevant to the "fringe bands" like
> 160M and 6M.
>
>
>
> The way I read the purposely non-detailed direction from the board
> "contemporaneous direct initiation by the operator on
>
> both sides of the contact.".  With the known software in mind, that would
> look to say that as long as you click on the callsign to be worked, it
> counts, even if it got worked hours later while you slept.
>
>
>
> But after it is worked, the next callsign has to have been clicked.  Which
> could be the next on the stack of calls of what you saw before you went to
> bed.
>
>
>
> So I don't see anything preventing someone from seeing and clicking on half
> a dozen calls before bedtime and waking up with all or many of them worked.
> Since 160M is a nighttime band and often the peak is in the middle of the
> night local time for EU or AF, it's a very relevant 160M DX topic.
>
>
>
> Is this okay?  I don't think so.
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>