All
I have been running a 160M Inverted L right up beside some pine trees to
the 80ft level and then I have the horizontal part moving away.
The support for the vertical part is in the tree it runs up beside.
I also have 4 Elevated radials at about 6ft (approx 1/4 wave).
I'm pretty pleased with its performance and I have had it in place for
years.
Mike va3mw
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:46 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
> I would never consider compromising a TX antenna just to hear better.
> Perhaps a T vertical with a feedline choke similar to your 80m dipole
> and feedline radiator footprint would help with any local noise. Also
> there are many small RX antenna options. My station in Aruba was on a
> small city lot and I used a Pennant for RX which definitely received
> better than my shortened TX vertical.
>
> John KK9A
>
>
>
> John Harper AE5X wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info guys.
>
> If only I had room for a dedicated rx antenna - then I'd leave the
> top-loaded vertical as is. I was copied in New Zealand with it on 630m WSPR
> with 1 watt ERP.
>
> So a happy medium is what I'm after since an excellent tx antenna does me
> no good if I can't hear those calling me.
>
> John AE5X
> https://ae5x.blogspot.com
>
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|