Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: DHDL

To: topBand List <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: DHDL
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:41:41 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
That statement doesn't agree with my quick modeling (I also wondered why my 40' base had some observed benefit on high bands now and then). Both a 60' for 160 and 40' for 80/40 worked fine.

for a 60' baseline, 6' Z bottom wire, 30' Z to top or about 190' of wire:

Freq Gain dbi F/B db peak ang

1.8   -31     12     20
3.5   -16     15     25
7.0   -4      9      30
10  elliptical broadside about 5 to 10db F/S, 25 deg elev
>14   spikey pattern broadside and low vertical gain, maybe not useful

EZNEC 4.2 over average soil. With higher conductivity soil, F/B improves a lot, and gain a few db. Patterns are about the same.

Grant KZ1W

On 6/30/2019 9:03 AM, Martin wrote:
Topbanders,
just read a few articles about DHDL antennas. One article states, the cut off frequency where the antenna becomes useless is when the overall length of wire reaches a 1/4WL. In my understanding the original dimensions , 2*7.5m vertical plus 22m horizontal plus 2*13.3m sloping wires equals 63meters, which is already a lot longer than 1/4WL on 160m. What did i miss?

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>