Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: DXCC 160m score

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: DXCC 160m score
From: radioamatér <ok1yq@centrum.cz>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:31:28 +0100
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Dear folks,
I was alerted ongoing discussion around my score on the 160m band. Mainly I am frustrated 
by questioning of the longest-running DXCC program and the work of the people at the ARRL 
desk. It is but a matter of those who doubt it. I personally spent over 55 years on HF 
bands and on the TopBand mainly. I was quite respected low bands DXer as wrote me Martti, 
OH2BH in his observations to the events of August 2016 / see further /. I don't want to 
bore much but there is a story. I had got my the first DXCC 160m award on my call OK1RD 
with approved score there 326 countries in 2008. Since 2009 year I went to EME on 6m and 
further on 2m band and was occasionally active on 160m band for a "new one" 
only. A few years after when I reached 100 DXCC countries on 2m band I asked for the DXCC 
award for this band. Unfortunately I was not in good relation with that time DXCC award 
manager NC1L ( SK nw ) and he refused awarding me on 2m DXCC award on call OK1RD. The 
time is running and suddenly
 Mr. Nigel Cawthorne, G3TXF a avid the DX expeditions man published this article         " 
http://www.g3txf.com/…ake-C21.html " <http://www.g3txf.com/…ake-C21.html> in August 2016.
He claims in his article that I (OK1RD ) fabricated evidence of C21XF QSL card for the propose to get C21 country confirmed on the 160m band. It started up an offensive against me with the purpose to destroy my over 55 years activity on the TopBand. I have got enormous numbers of messages in which even well known HAMs called me swindler. Therefore I started investigation how this case could even happen. My standpoints and facts have been already published.  But nobody trusted my arguments so I decided to apply for DXCC 160m a new award on my other call OK1YQ to clean up my name. Thereby I became among the top of the TopBand DXers again and it triggered a wave of hates and doubts again. The ARRL DX desk had no other choice then to initiate an auditing process of the me submitted according to the article 13 of the  DXCC rules. See below :
13.  DXCC Audit Process: In order to maintain continuing program integrity and 
for quality control purposes, DXCC routinely conducts audits of credits claimed for 
DXCC awards. To verify the authenticity of the QSOs claimed, audits may be conducted 
on claims for QSO credits for current applications, or credits already in a DXCC 
award account. Audits may include, but are not limited to:
    Checking online logs (preliminary check);
    Contacting DX stations for log extracts;
    Contacting QSL managers for log extracts; and
    Verifying credits submitted via Logbook of the World (LoTW)
Audits are generally conducted on a random basis. Response to audit requests to DXCC 
applicants are required. Failure, or refusal, to respond to these requests may 
result in removal of the credits requested by DXCC and/or removal of the awards 
pertaining to the audit.  Events may also lead to disqualification from the 
DXCC program.
Costs for postage, by a secure and traceable method to, and from, DXCC will be 
covered by the ARRL Desk.
Audits that reveal discrepancies may lead to an investigation by the Awards 
Committee.
All my 343 QSLs passed through in details this process and I am convinced 
nobody of you who challenge my score on 160m band had to pass this sort of 
audit. So please stop useless discussion on this unquestionable fact.
I think there are more important matters concerning our hobby and the TopBand 
mainly. For example I tell you story :
I met one HAM with call OK7...... who during 10 years of activity on the 
TopBand reached score on the 160m DXCC standings which-if I remember well- I 
reached this score after 40 years my activity on this band. He sneered at me 
that I invested during almost 6 decades a lot of money and personal effort and 
he told that it is much easy to hire a remote QTH site on the other continents 
and then is quite easy to work for e.g. Pacific area than for us in EU . This 
one is destroying our hobby now in the future.
So I would recommend to those who question the work of the ARRL to turn the 
attention to this problem.
Let me wish all of you here a steady health in 2019 and especially for us over 
70 mainly.
73 Jarda, OK1YQ, OK1RD, OK7XX
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: DXCC 160m score, radioamatér <=