| To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: 4-square antenna spacing |
| From: | Jim & Nan Denneny <57jndenneny@comcast.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:57:16 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Manual says min spacing for 160M is 54ft and optimal spacing is 135ft. 135ft is a non-starter for my lot. Can anyone comment on performance degradation between these two extremes? Minimal? Substantial? Sensitivity? f/b? I cannot find experimental data. Jim K7EG Sent from Mail for Windows 10 _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: Baker Island DXpedition on 160, Guy Olinger K2AV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 4-square antenna spacing, Ed Hughes |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Fwd: Re: Baker Island DXpedition on 160, F Z_Bruce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 4-square antenna spacing, Ed Hughes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |