| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical |
| From: | Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:45:00 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
The one big problem with parasitic arrays is that you must have low enough ground resistance to get the proper current to flow in the element. With a driven array, you can force the elements to have the proper current distribution. 73, Roger On 2/5/2018 4:18 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: Could you not get more out those elements if you had phased them? Obviously there would be more work required for the phasing system. One element short of a 4 square. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: FCC authorizes 1KW wireless power transmission experimental station WJ2XGB on 160 meter band, donovanf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Best hf +top band antenna, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical, Joel Harrison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |