Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna

To: "'Mike Waters'" <mikewate@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna
From: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:14:13 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Question on the choke balun. I am using a Comtek 100 bead over RG-400
feedline choke on my shunt fed tower. Would there be a noticeable difference
by replacing with a stack of ferrite cores and several turns of coax?
73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Waters
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2017 3:11 PM
To: Mike Furrey <mikefurrey@att.net>
Cc: gary mankoff <garyjm88@gmail.com>; topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna

The importance of a ferrite choke balun at the feedpoint cannot be
overemphasized. A good design for 160m is 5 or 6 turns of coax wound through
five stacked 2.4" 31-material ferrite toroids. Photos and details on my web
pages referenced earlier.

I had two elevated radials. It is a well-established fact that four 10' or
12' high 1/4 wave radials are as good as 120 on the ground.

73 Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Aug 27, 2017 12:53 PM, "Mike Furrey" <mikefurrey@att.net> wrote:

Hi Gary,
For many years I used an inverted L between two tall pine trees and one
elevated radial that was L shaped to fit on the 90' x 60' lot I had in
Spring, TX. The radial was about 15' up and it was fed through a choke
balun.
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>